Waterline Design

October 26th, 2011

There is no pressure pipe tool in AutoCAD® Civil 3D®… or is there?  Let’s think about this.  Pressure pipe is first positioned horizontally, then vertically.  If there is a change in the horizontal plan, the vertical plan needs to reflect that change.  At times, pipes need to be designed using horizontal and vertical curves. 

Conflicts need to easily be factored in and navigated around.  When there is a change in pipe size, pipe views need to update graphically.  When pipes are deflecting greater than a given angle, a notification is needed.  Structures need to be oriented to the pipe in the profile view, not the profile view itself.  Annotation needs to be dynamic.

Horizontal Layout

A lot of great beginnings occur in Civil 3D with an alignment.  We use alignments to base the design of roads, sewers, and any other design item of considerable length and typical cross section.  Pressure pipe fits those criteria.  Alignments by design are easily plotted and profiled. 

Much of the time, we conceptualize by using polylines.  Polylines can be offset, filleted, chamfered, extended, trimmed, and gripped; i.e., polylines are very easy to manipulate.  When a polyline or a series of polylines have been modeled into a sufficient 2D representation of a run or network of pressure pipe, it/they can easily be used to define an alignment.  A network of pressure pipe may require multiple alignments.

Figure 1: Take advantage of object naming in Civil 3D to keep objects organized and identifiable.

Points in Civil 3D do double duty.  Points are objects that store grid locations and descriptions of items of interest such as signs, benchmarks, manholes, or property corners.  When object and label styles are applied, points are capable of displaying symbology and custom labeling based on description, point numbers or names, or elevations.  So, points perform two basic duties:  information storage and display.  Alignments function in the same way. 

According to Autodesk’s glossary, alignments are “a series of 2D coordinates (northings and eastings), connected by lines, curves, or spirals, used to represent features such as the road centerlines, edges of pavement, sidewalks, or rights of way.”  So, in other words, alignment definitions store information. 

Alignments can also be configured to display as something other than a centerline.  An alignment style can be created utilizing AutoCAD® properties such a layer, color, linetype, etc., so that when the plan is reviewed, it looks like a waterline, not an alignment. 

To be sure that pipes do not exceed a maximum deflection angle, which would create the requirement for a fitting, a design check can be configured into the alignment properties.  This would have to be a curve design check since it is the only check available that can analyze the two intersecting tangents.  To run the check, a small default curve radius would be set up when the alignments are created.  The check would look something like this:  RAD2DEG({Delta Angle})<8 where 8 degrees would be the maximum angle for joint deflection.  Of course this number would depend on the type of pipe/joints you are using. 

Figure 2: Warning glyphs appear where two 45 degree bends are proposed.

Vertical Layout

When we determine how pressure pipe is positioned vertically, we usually start at the frost line.  Depending on where you live on the planet, you start with a given depth.  In order to properly demarcate this depth for the vertical design of your waterline, create a profile view with a surface profile representing the frost line.

Create a surface representing the frost line and paste the design surface into it.  Lower it by the given depth.  Then create the frost line surface profiles for each waterline alignment and place in profile view.  Demarcating the frost line using this method will ensure that any updates to the design surface will be displayed in these profile views.

At this point, these waterline profile views are being used for the sole purpose of design, not plan production.  There is a profile view style that could be developed that would be very helpful in determining the best vertical layout.  A profile view with a vertical exaggeration of 1 would help differentiate between what are deflections and where bends are required.  Horizontal and vertical grid lines removed would provide uncluttered drawing space.  Displaying grids at only horizontal geometry points reveal where the waterline changes direction horizontally and other structure locations such as tees; inserting alignment PIs at tee locations will cause the display of a horizontal geometry point grid line.  If vertical bends are required, this helps us recognize if there are any horizontal constraints in the vicinity. 

Figure 3: Once the profile view is created, the pipe can be “sketched” in using the Profile Creation tools. 

Design checks can be configured in the waterline profile properties that will display a warning glyph if a maximum deflection angle has been exceeded.  Again, this would be a curve check for the same reasons.  Applying a default circular curve radius for crest and sag curve in the vertical curve settings would enable this design check to run.  Configure a small value if you do not want curvy pipes and a large value if you do.  This design check would look something like this:  BS(RAD2DEG(ATAN({Grade In}))-RAD2DEG(ATAN({Grade Out})))<8 where 8 degrees would be the maximum angle for joint deflection.

Conflicts

After creating the preliminary waterline profile, utility conflicts will need to be examined.  The goal is to bring the conflicts into the profile view, start at the beginning and work our way to the end adjusting any deflections and determining if we require vertical bends.

Proposed Pipe Networks

Typically, the waterline is the last to be designed.  If storm and sanitary have been designed using pipe networks, any of those crossings can be placed in this profile view. 

Figure 4: Using AutoCAD measuring tools, we can check clearances.

You can use grips to adjust the waterline in profile. To delineate clearances and angles for vertical bends, construction lines can be drawn easily since the vertical scale matches the horizontal scale in this profile view.  In the case below, an 18” vertical and a 10’ horizontal clearance need to be maintained between water and sanitary.  Simple block templates representing the vertical bend configuration can be inserted.  PVIs can be created and gripped to match the waterline to this shape.

Figure 5: If warning glyphs do not appear where deflections are planned, the angles at that PVI are acceptable.

Existing Utilities

Existing utilities are a different matter.  The vertical locations are not always known, especially in the case of dry utilities.  It’s important to indicate their presence in the published set of construction documents and to anticipate a vertical design around them.  A great way to coordinate their placement into profile view is to mark them with points, collect them in a point group, assign elevations from your frost line surface, and project those points into profile view. 

Point groups are a great way to manipulate more than one point with a common property.  In this case, one of the functions of the point group would be to control the display or non-display of the points in plan.

Figure 6: Points placed at utility crossings are managed by point group.

The point group also functions as a selection set for assigning elevations from the frost line surface and for projecting points into profile. 

Figure 7: Points at utility crossings are projected into profile view.

Pipe Profile Aesthetics

In the past, waterlines have been drawn in AutoCAD with a combination of linework, blocks, and text.  So far, the discussion has taken us down the road of defining this waterline with an alignment and profile, coincidentally—just  like we do with roads.  The next step in road design would be to create a corridor.  That is also the next step with this pressure pipe design.  Creating a pipe corridor will enable us to create the waterline’s bottom linework in profile by projecting the resulting feature line into the profile view.

Figure 8: Bottom of pipe indicated by a feature line generated by a corridor based on the water alignment and profile.

Creating the subassembly for this is quick and simple.  Use the generic link LinkVertical. Create an assembly for each pipe size.  When the pipe size changes in a run of pipe, split the region and change to the appropriate assembly.  To closely match the curvature of your top of pipe profile, use a frequency of 5’ or 1.5m on profile curves.  Tangents and horizontal curves need not be changed.

Figure 9: Use LinkVertical generic subassembly to generate bottom of pipe feature line.

Structures

Structures for pressure pipe can be handled using two similar methods: Block Definitions or Points.
Blocks:  Most users already have a block library containing standard water symbology so the block definition method could be adapted quickly.
Points:  Blocks representing water structure symbols can also be configured to point styles.  Scaling can be managed through description keys or point styles.  Description keys can be used to manage point styles, point label styles, and parameter usage.  Water structure points can be collected and managed in a point group. 

Ultimately, once the blocks or points are placed in plan, they can be projected into profile.  The elevation of these points can be controlled by a surface generated at the top of pipe. 

Figure 10: Project blocks or points to profile to generate profiled structures.

To generate the surface, a generic link called LinkOffsetAndSlope can be added to the existing pipe assemblies that extends from the top of pipe marker out 2’ @ 0%.  After the corridor rebuilds, a surface can be created in corridor properties.

Figure 11: Use a flat generic link to generate top of pipe surface for projected  structures.

Figure 12: Block projection versus point projection.

With this method, structures will always be anchored to the top of pipe in profile so if the vertical design of the top of pipe changes, the structures will follow.  Also, if the horizontal location of the structure changes, the profile will update.

Unfortunately, where the point method falls short is when a point is rotated in plan.  When the point is projected to profile, the point in profile will also be rotated.  Blocks do not do this.

Annotation

Structures in Plan

In plan, if points are used to represent structures, annotation can be accomplished with point labels, which can be configured from the full description utilizing strings of parameters.

If blocks are used to represent structures, then annotation can be manually placed using general note labels.

Figure 13: Use description keys to assign styles and manage point annotation.

Pipes in Plan

For pipe runs in plan, instead of using a special linetype that places a “W” every so often, why not use major station labels every hundred feet or so?  If there is a change in scale, these Ws will resize so they can be read.  They can also be gripped and moved individually by holding down the control key; certain Ws can be edited and pipe size can be added.

Figure 14: Major station labels can be used to annotate water alignment.

Annotation showing length can be created using alignment line labels.  The size or material type can be read from the alignment description or can be manually altered using Edit Label Text.

Figure 15: Alignment line labels are used for lengths of pipe.

Structures in Profile

When points or blocks are projected into profile, a profile view projection label can be associated with each.  Projection labels can pull alignment station, profile elevation, raw point descriptions, and block names.  These labels can be manually altered using Edit Label Text.

Figure 16: Blocks or points representing structures can be projected into profile view.

If using points and full descriptions are needed, a reference text component can be used in the label style.  Once the label is placed, the point object can be configured to that reference text component using label properties.

Figure 17: Full descriptions are configured in projection labels.

Pipes in Profile

Labels for pipe runs in profile based on the waterline design profile can be created with profile horizontal geometry bands, which will annotate alignment tangent length.  These bands can be configured into a waterline profile view and can be relocated individually with grips by holding the CTRL key.

Figure 18: Pipe lengths in profile can be labeled using a band.

Updates

If tees or bends relocate, affecting the length of the waterline tangents, tangent length labels update in plan and profile. 
Projections and projection label locations update as well.

If a vertical adjustment is made to the top of pipe profile, the corridor updates, which causes the feature line to follow.  The top of pipe surface updates, which causes the projections and projection labels to follow.

If the design surface changes, the frost line profile updates and the vertical design of the waterline can be re-evaluated. 

If the size of pipe must change, the assembly is swapped out, the corridor rebuilds, and the bottom of pipe updates in profile.  If the alignment description is being used to annotate pipe size, it must be manually updated in the alignment properties.  However, that will cause all labels referencing that property to update.

Conclusion

Setting up waterlines as alignments and profiles enables us to achieve design objectives by utilizing a set of tools that help us stay within constraints horizontally and vertically:  projections, design checks, and profile PVI editing.  Once the necessary tools are in place (styles, design checks, and assemblies), waterline design in AutoCAD Civil 3D is a breeze and much easier to manipulate than if done in pipe networks. 

Cyndy Davenport began in the industry cutting her teeth on roadway projects, site plans, subdivisions,  and federal open-end contracts. Cyndy transitioned into IT/CAD management functioning as a mentor and support resource for firms in the Virginia Beach/Norfolk area for 17 years. She spent 6 years working for one of the largest resellers/solution providers in North America providing implementation services nationwide as Project Manager of Infrastructure Solutions.  After relocating to the Washington, DC area, she is now with Bowman Consulting Group as their Design Systems Implementation Manager implementing Civil 3D throughout 14 offices. She often writes on her blog, Fierce Solutions (http://c3dcougar.typepad.com) and maintains a professional presence on Twitter.

Join AUGI Today

Become part of the largest Autodesk community


About the Authors

Appears in these Categories